Tag Archives: rebreather

The Ancients Used Hands-Free Equalization, And So Should You

by Tim Blömeke

Some months ago in the classroom of Tech Asia (Philippines), I came upon a little booklet of unambiguously antiquarian character: “Diving with the Aqua-Lung”, 11th edition, published by U.S. Divers in 1959.

The old-timey design caught my eye, and I succumbed to what my beloved sister has dubbed the “alphabet sickness:” a mental condition which causes those who suffer from it to, upon exposure to the written word, immediately drop whatever they were doing at the time and start reading compulsively.

The half-letter size booklet offers a fascinating glimpse into the early days of civilian scuba diving. It is a collage of Open Water Diver textbook, regulator maintenance manual, and guidance on setting up a filling station. It also has decompression tables, instructions on hookah diving, and even tips on how to start a dive club – all on a mere 40 pages of crisp, well-written prose. As an instructor and student of diving, I wish more training materials were like that… but I digress.

Stylistic merits aside, “Diving with the Aqua-Lung” has some nuggets of information to offer, one of which I’d like to spend a little more time on. In the third paragraph of the introduction, the authors drop this here (from a modern-day perspective) bomb:

Lets have that again: “The ear-drums […] will remain in a neutral state” simply because we breathe air at ambient pressure? That is, no active equalization? Yessir, you heard correctly. It is a description of what we refer to today as hands-free equalization, a technique that is considered quite advanced by modern standards, so advanced in fact that many scuba divers will never hear about it. Yet people took it for granted in the 1950s, ostensibly. Or did they? I’ll get back to that question in a bit.

How does it work?

Most divers learn about equalization only once, during their Open Water Diver training. “Gently exhale against your pinched nostrils. Very gently. Do you feel your ears pop? Yes? You sure? Cool, you’re good to go.”

That’s what my OWD instruction was like, and I’m sure many will find it familiar. It works… kind of. Unless the instructor is quite careful, divers instructed in this way somewhat randomly end up performing one of two equalization techniques. The luckier ones instinctively close their glottis and use a swallowing action to pump air into the Eustachian tubes – the Frenzel maneuver. This is adequate, and the majority of divers, even instructors, never progress beyond this level.

The less lucky ones keep their glottis open and pump from the diaphragm – the Valsava maneuver. The diaphragm is a much stronger muscle and more difficult to control. As a result, Valsalva divers more frequently report ear pain after diving, and the risk of barotrauma is greater. Such divers generally remain unaware of the cause – equalization probably won’t come up in future training, and you need to know what you’re looking for to tell the difference as an outside observer.

With either of the above techniques, the textbook instruction is to equalize frequently during descent, at least every couple of meters. For a dive to 60 meters, that’s a lot of equalizing.

Leveling up

What if, instead of frequent, your equalization could be continuous? What if you could go all the way down to the bottom without touching your mask, and without feeling your ears? Welcome to hands-free equalization – the technique so casually alluded to in the introduction to our little booklet from – *checks calendar* – sixty-six years ago.

The benefits of this technique are twofold: On one hand, you will experience virtually no pressure changes on your ears during descent. Even if you think that’s no big deal and Frenzel is fine, once you experience hands-free, it’s like your neighbor’s kids finally turn off that gaming console they’ve been running all day long, to the point where you thought you’d stopped noticing the noise. You will notice when it stops and “your ear-drums […] remain in a neutral state.” It’s nice.

On the other hand, and this applies more to technical and CCR divers, you’ll have both of your hands free to signal during descent checks, operate your BCD, drysuit inflation valve, primary light, DPV, diluent MAV, or whatever other part of your kit might need your attention. Or you could just relax.

Hands-free is a superior equalization technique, once you’ve mastered it, and herein lies the crux. All the involved musculature is internal. Instructors can’t demonstrate the technique to students, only describe it,* which makes this method much trickier to teach than the nose-pinching styles. I strongly suspect that’s why hands-free equalization isn’t mentioned in modern scuba training materials. Freediving… different story. Those guys take equalization quite seriously.

So what about folks in the 1950s?

The booklet talks a little more about equalization in a section titled “Hints on Diving or Underwater Swimming”, subsection “Pains in the ears” (page 14). The authors explain how sinuses generally equalize by themselves, whereas the ears may take a little longer due to the small diameter of the Eustachian tubes.

They go on to describe two equalization techniques: (a) swallowing and (b) pressing the mask against the face and exhaling into it through the nose.** However, these techniques aren’t presented as essential, but merely as ancillary to a process that is taking place anyway. Nowhere in this booklet does it say, “as you descend, here’s how you equalize,” like modern training materials do.


In this sense, I believe it’s fair to conclude that hands-free equalization was considered the norm.

Trying to come up with an explanation for why that is and how, I believe things become easier to understand if you consider what kind of person would have gotten into scuba diving in the 1950s. At the time, new scuba divers very likely would’ve been practiced skin divers (to use the period term) already. After all, why would you go and buy a scuba unit if you didn’t like diving? And if you like diving, then you obviously know how to equalize. Case closed. To this day, Open Water Diver courses include a legacy skin diving section to reflect this history.

Equalization is significantly harder on breathhold dives, especially when going deep. A competent skin diver experiencing the Aqua-Lung for the first time would’ve been surprised by the relative ease: All you need to do is to allow the pressure in your lungs to propagate to the eardrums. Piece of cake.***

Taking a page from the Book of the Ancients

Today, beginner scuba courses need to accommodate the needs of people who don’t know how to equalize yet. And with modern masks that allow for nose pinching, the Frenzel maneuver is good enough, a lot easier to teach, and gets people under water quicker – crucial when a course is scheduled to take three days because people have flights to catch on day four.

However, this doesn’t mean you have to remain at that level. Much like trim, buoyancy control, finning, and other personal dive skills, equalization can be improved beyond the minimum requirements for passing an open-water course. Let the Ancients be your guide and learn the hands-free technique. Your ears will thank you.

If you enjoyed this article, you could do me a favor by going back to where you found it (social media) and giving that post a like, comment, and/or share. Cheers and safe diving, always!

Footnotes:

* The key to teaching hands-free equalization is finding a verbal instruction that makes the student do the right thing with the muscles in their throat. I find that “pretend you’re suppressing a yawn” tends to work for a lot of people. Even so, it usually takes some time and experimentation. But believe me, it’s worth your while.

** 1950s dive masks had very thick, stiff skirts and no nose pockets. Pinching the nose from the outside was just not possible; pushing the mask against the face and increasing the pressure inside by exhaling through the nose was the next best thing. Search for “Charlie Sturgill mask” to learn about the gold standard of diving masks at the time.

*** My own first exposure to scuba diving was a bit like that. Our training as junior lifeguards in late 1980s West Germany involved lots of skin diving (albeit only Frenzel equalization, no hands-free). Every now and then, one of the instructors would bring a couple of scuba tanks to the pool to spice things up.

“Do you need a rebreather?”

Of course I do. Shut up already and take my money!

Jokes aside, going closed is a big decision, with ramifications that are not obvious at the time the decision is made. As a result, quite a few folks who take the training and maybe even buy a unit end up reverting to open circuit, thousands of [insert currency unit] in the hole.

To avoid such frustration, it is worth doing some research into the actual prerequisites, beyond mere agency standards, for making the transition to closed circuit a rewarding endeavor.

For this article in Alert Diver, I interviewed six renowned and prolific instructors to learn what it takes to become – and remain – a CCR diver.

Carbon Dioxide, part two: Complications

Excess carbon dioxide can be a source of danger at any level of diving, yet it is barely mentioned in course curricula. Here is part two of my three-part mini series for Alert Diver on the subject, in which I get into the nuts and bolts of how carbon dioxide affects us, and the special considerations we need to take into account when diving.

Review: 100 hours on the Fathom Mk III rebreather – UPDATED

by Tim Blömeke

Puerto Galera, Philippines, February 2024
In March last year, I trained on the Fathom Mk III CCR under Kelvin Davidson in Mexico. Since then, I’ve had opportunity to use it in different environments and circumstances, both for my own enjoyment and in my role as a dive professional. I recently completed my first 100 hours on the unit, and I thought this might be a good milestone to revisit my experiences.

Photo credit: Katia Chen

Background

I’m an open circuit trimix instructor and tech dive guide working mainly out of Puerto Galera, Philippines. I’ve been a rebreather diver since 2017, and the Fathom is my second unit.

Once bitten, twice shy: Having experienced a number of reliability issues with the electronics of my first rebreather, I wanted to switch to a manual unit. At the time, I only knew of two – KISS and the now-discontinued Pelagian – and I spent some time looking at my options for either.

Why the Fathom?

Then I stumbled across a rebreather I hadn’t heard of before, the Fathom. Going by the specs, it ticked all of my boxes. and the design notes by Fathom Dive Systems CEO Charlie Roberson spoke to me in a loud and clear voice: Robust and minimalistic, with fully potted (sealed) wiring, coax sensor connectors, adjustable constant mass flow injection of O2, passive Shearwater electronics, back-mounted counterlungs, and an option for on-board bailout.

As chance would have it, I already knew my instructor: Kelvin Davidson, owner of Third Dimension Diving in Tulum, Mexico, whose facilities my partner Katia and I had used twice on cave diving trips. I contacted him to inquire about the unit and a training course.

Although the price tag is considerable and instruction is currently available only on the far side of the planet, I was sold. I took a big leap of faith and broke the piggy bank. My partner and I purchased a unit each and booked a trip to Tulum for training.

Training

Though technically a crossover class, training on the Fathom ended up being more of a re-training in rebreather diving in general. Although I had accumulated about 120 hours on my prior unit, I hadn’t dived on closed circuit in over three years and had gotten quite rusty. There are also considerable differences in how the two units handle, as well as in the overall concepts and methods of using a rebreather as taught by Kelvin (who was himself involved in the Fathom’s development) compared to my prior training.

In a word, I had my hands full for a while, but it was more than worth it in the end: I was doing proper cave dives on my new CCR. I’m deeply grateful to Kelvin and the Third Dimension team for their support and the lessons learned, and I can’t recommend these guys highly enough.

Change of scenery

For the first 40-odd hours, I had dived in cenotes, caverns, and caves, to a maximum depth of no more than 30 meters. After a three-month stint in Europe with virtually no diving, my next task was to learn how to use the Fathom in a different environment – my home turf, the tropical seas of the Philippines, with their occasionally strong currents and greater depths.

I began with a series of shallower tryout dives to fine-tune the configuration and get used to blue-water ascents before gradually extending my range, adding a scooter and more bailouts. At this point, I would like to give a shoutout to my friend and JJ CCR virtuoso Karl Hurwood, whose advice and encouragement have been very valuable.

Handling and operation

Despite its being a manual unit, diving a Fathom requires surprisingly little manual intervention once you get the hang of it. At depth, the adjustable constant mass flow design for oxygen injection (fixed-IP first first stage and needle valve) works remarkably well. I rarely have to touch the oxygen MAV at all, except during ascent and deco, when everybody has to do that anyway, including eCCR divers.

Since I opted for the version without an ADV (another once-bitten-twice-shy situation here), I’m a little busier during descent than my JJ-using buddies. However, managing descents has become natural pretty fast. It’s much like driving a stick shift vs. automatic transmission – yes, it takes a little bit of extra practice, but ultimately, the outcome is very similar.

While I wear a drysuit for bigger (by my standards) dives, the unit is lightweight enough to be dived comfortably even in a thin wetsuit when paired with aluminum cylinders. The buoyancy characteristics and balance of my configuration feel similar to those of an AL80 set of doubles.

The work of breathing is very low, comparable to open circuit. The on-board bailout configuration with manifolded dual diluent tanks (“GUE configuration”) eliminates the bottom bailout stage, which feels very clean and leaves the front of the body unencumbered.

These days (as of February 2024), I am making 90-minute trimix dives in the 60+ meter range on a regular basis and have started using my unit for work. I dive it every chance I get outside of work as well (i.e., when not teaching open circuit) and have been averaging about 15 hours per month lately.

Summary

I can’t describe the Fathom as anything but a workhorse, in the best sense of the word. It behaves in very predictable ways and is comfortable and intuitive to dive. The build quality is stellar, and there doesn’t appear to be much about the unit that can actually break down. Aside from the canister, head (fully sealed, no service required), and counterlungs, all other parts are generic and can be sourced on the open market. This reduces dependence on manufacturer service to a minimum – not a concern for everybody, but a pretty big deal where I dive.

I’ve had zero issues that I didn’t create for myself. Should any problems materialize, I’m confident that I can deal with them with the tools and tech skills that I have (which include regulator service but not electronics). I look forward to many more hours of hassle-free diving and would unconditionally recommend the Fathom as a rebreather for remote locations.

On a final, general note, I believe that the introduction of this unit marks the point where manual CCR technology has become fully mature. While eCCRs remain an area of active research and development, and there is some competition in the sidemount CCR market as well, I find it difficult to imagine anyone spending time and money on an attempt to improve on the Fathom, much less succeed at it. If a manual backmount CCR is what you want, then Fathom is the way to go.

My experience so far
in numbers
Time on the unit: 109 h
Deepest dive: 75 m
Longest dive: 190 min
Times I had to bail out: 0
Electronics problems: 0
Mechanical problems: 0
Lessons learned: yes
Sharks seen: lots

UPDATE (September 2025)
Revisiting this post a year and a half and well over a hundred hours down the road (250+), I stand by pretty much everything said above. The Mk3 continues to perform exceptionally well – so well in fact that I recently took the plunge and became an instructor on the unit.

In terms of problems, I had one issue with the handset, which was promptly taken care of by Shearwater. For completeness sake, I’ve also had to replace an O-ring.

As regards range, my biggest dive so far was in the context of a project to dive the USS Ommaney Bay, a WW2 escort carrier at the bottom of the Sulu Sea, at 115 meters of depth. No upgrades to the unit were required for these dives; the Fathom handles them in the out-of-the-box configuration.

TL;DR: If you’re looking for a rebreather that is up to the demands of big dives dives in remote locations and just keeps going, you couldn’t wish for anything better than the Mk3. Please feel free to reach out for questions regarding the unit or inquiries about training,

Rebreather operating costs – a closer look

The high price and limited availability of helium have made rebreathers pretty much a must have piece of equipment for frequent trimix divers. However, just because you’re saving a lot on gas doesn’t mean rebreather diving is cheap – those gas savings come with a price tag, and whether that price tag is worth it very much depends on how much you actually dive.

Check out my latest piece for the Alert Diver blog for my take on the matter.

Mixed-Team Diving: Rebreathers and Open Circuit

Inspired by a talk by Mauritius Valente Bell at RF4 in Malta, my latest piece for Alert Diver deals with diving in mixed teams of open and closed-circuit divers.

While Mauritius’ presentation focused mainly on the perspective of rebreather divers, my piece is addressed to an audience of experienced recreational and open-circuit technical divers. Check it out to learn how the dark side ticks.

Notes from Rebreather Forum 4

I had the pleasure and the honor to cover RF4 for DAN Europe last month. It was an amazing experience meeting the Who’s Who of technical diving, hyperbaric science, and diving technology. I certainly learned a lot, met some really cool people who do great things, and took home a whole list of ideas for new articles.

Here are three blog posts I wrote to summarize what went on on each of the three main days of the conference.

Day One

Day Two

Day Three

Thanks are due to Michael Menduno and his team for their fantastic work organizing the event, and to DAN Europe for putting me in charge of reporting. Stay safe and happy reading!