Tag Archives: diving

The Ancients Used Hands-Free Equalization, And So Should You

by Tim Blömeke

Some months ago in the classroom of Tech Asia (Philippines), I came upon a little booklet of unambiguously antiquarian character: “Diving with the Aqua-Lung”, 11th edition, published by U.S. Divers in 1959.

The old-timey design caught my eye, and I succumbed to what my beloved sister has dubbed the “alphabet sickness:” a mental condition which causes those who suffer from it to, upon exposure to the written word, immediately drop whatever they were doing at the time and start reading compulsively.

The half-letter size booklet offers a fascinating glimpse into the early days of civilian scuba diving. It is a collage of Open Water Diver textbook, regulator maintenance manual, and guidance on setting up a filling station. It also has decompression tables, instructions on hookah diving, and even tips on how to start a dive club – all on a mere 40 pages of crisp, well-written prose. As an instructor and student of diving, I wish more training materials were like that… but I digress.

Stylistic merits aside, “Diving with the Aqua-Lung” has some nuggets of information to offer, one of which I’d like to spend a little more time on. In the third paragraph of the introduction, the authors drop this here (from a modern-day perspective) bomb:

Lets have that again: “The ear-drums […] will remain in a neutral state” simply because we breathe air at ambient pressure? That is, no active equalization? Yessir, you heard correctly. It is a description of what we refer to today as hands-free equalization, a technique that is considered quite advanced by modern standards, so advanced in fact that many scuba divers will never hear about it. Yet people took it for granted in the 1950s, ostensibly. Or did they? I’ll get back to that question in a bit.

How does it work?

Most divers learn about equalization only once, during their Open Water Diver training. “Gently exhale against your pinched nostrils. Very gently. Do you feel your ears pop? Yes? You sure? Cool, you’re good to go.”

That’s what my OWD instruction was like, and I’m sure many will find it familiar. It works… kind of. Unless the instructor is quite careful, divers instructed in this way somewhat randomly end up performing one of two equalization techniques. The luckier ones instinctively close their glottis and use a swallowing action to pump air into the Eustachian tubes – the Frenzel maneuver. This is adequate, and the majority of divers, even instructors, never progress beyond this level.

The less lucky ones keep their glottis open and pump from the diaphragm – the Valsava maneuver. The diaphragm is a much stronger muscle and more difficult to control. As a result, Valsalva divers more frequently report ear pain after diving, and the risk of barotrauma is greater. Such divers generally remain unaware of the cause – equalization probably won’t come up in future training, and you need to know what you’re looking for to tell the difference as an outside observer.

With either of the above techniques, the textbook instruction is to equalize frequently during descent, at least every couple of meters. For a dive to 60 meters, that’s a lot of equalizing.

Leveling up

What if, instead of frequent, your equalization could be continuous? What if you could go all the way down to the bottom without touching your mask, and without feeling your ears? Welcome to hands-free equalization – the technique so casually alluded to in the introduction to our little booklet from – *checks calendar* – sixty-six years ago.

The benefits of this technique are twofold: On one hand, you will experience virtually no pressure changes on your ears during descent. Even if you think that’s no big deal and Frenzel is fine, once you experience hands-free, it’s like your neighbor’s kids finally turn off that gaming console they’ve been running all day long, to the point where you thought you’d stopped noticing the noise. You will notice when it stops and “your ear-drums […] remain in a neutral state.” It’s nice.

On the other hand, and this applies more to technical and CCR divers, you’ll have both of your hands free to signal during descent checks, operate your BCD, drysuit inflation valve, primary light, DPV, diluent MAV, or whatever other part of your kit might need your attention. Or you could just relax.

Hands-free is a superior equalization technique, once you’ve mastered it, and herein lies the crux. All the involved musculature is internal. Instructors can’t demonstrate the technique to students, only describe it,* which makes this method much trickier to teach than the nose-pinching styles. I strongly suspect that’s why hands-free equalization isn’t mentioned in modern scuba training materials. Freediving… different story. Those guys take equalization quite seriously.

So what about folks in the 1950s?

The booklet talks a little more about equalization in a section titled “Hints on Diving or Underwater Swimming”, subsection “Pains in the ears” (page 14). The authors explain how sinuses generally equalize by themselves, whereas the ears may take a little longer due to the small diameter of the Eustachian tubes.

They go on to describe two equalization techniques: (a) swallowing and (b) pressing the mask against the face and exhaling into it through the nose.** However, these techniques aren’t presented as essential, but merely as ancillary to a process that is taking place anyway. Nowhere in this booklet does it say, “as you descend, here’s how you equalize,” like modern training materials do.


In this sense, I believe it’s fair to conclude that hands-free equalization was considered the norm.

Trying to come up with an explanation for why that is and how, I believe things become easier to understand if you consider what kind of person would have gotten into scuba diving in the 1950s. At the time, new scuba divers very likely would’ve been practiced skin divers (to use the period term) already. After all, why would you go and buy a scuba unit if you didn’t like diving? And if you like diving, then you obviously know how to equalize. Case closed. To this day, Open Water Diver courses include a legacy skin diving section to reflect this history.

Equalization is significantly harder on breathhold dives, especially when going deep. A competent skin diver experiencing the Aqua-Lung for the first time would’ve been surprised by the relative ease: All you need to do is to allow the pressure in your lungs to propagate to the eardrums. Piece of cake.***

Taking a page from the Book of the Ancients

Today, beginner scuba courses need to accommodate the needs of people who don’t know how to equalize yet. And with modern masks that allow for nose pinching, the Frenzel maneuver is good enough, a lot easier to teach, and gets people under water quicker – crucial when a course is scheduled to take three days because people have flights to catch on day four.

However, this doesn’t mean you have to remain at that level. Much like trim, buoyancy control, finning, and other personal dive skills, equalization can be improved beyond the minimum requirements for passing an open-water course. Let the Ancients be your guide and learn the hands-free technique. Your ears will thank you.

If you enjoyed this article, you could do me a favor by going back to where you found it (social media) and giving that post a like, comment, and/or share. Cheers and safe diving, always!

Footnotes:

* The key to teaching hands-free equalization is finding a verbal instruction that makes the student do the right thing with the muscles in their throat. I find that “pretend you’re suppressing a yawn” tends to work for a lot of people. Even so, it usually takes some time and experimentation. But believe me, it’s worth your while.

** 1950s dive masks had very thick, stiff skirts and no nose pockets. Pinching the nose from the outside was just not possible; pushing the mask against the face and increasing the pressure inside by exhaling through the nose was the next best thing. Search for “Charlie Sturgill mask” to learn about the gold standard of diving masks at the time.

*** My own first exposure to scuba diving was a bit like that. Our training as junior lifeguards in late 1980s West Germany involved lots of skin diving (albeit only Frenzel equalization, no hands-free). Every now and then, one of the instructors would bring a couple of scuba tanks to the pool to spice things up.

Diver Propulsion Vehicles: Tools, Toys Troubles

Those who have dived with me know how highly I value scooters (DPVs) as tools to enhance both the fun the safety of technical diving. The Suex XJ-S I purchased a couple years ago continues to be one of my favorite pieces of kit.

Yet as with any powerful tool, improper use can get you in trouble in new and possibly unanticipated ways. Here’s my take on the matter for Alert DIver.

The Art of Being Found At Sea

Coming back safely from an ocean dive is more than a question of personal dive skills and a prudent approach to decompression. After surfacing, there is one more step: getting picked up by a boat. It sucks when that doesn’t happen.

From basics like DSMBs and good coordination with the crew all the way to personal locator beacons and other electronic communication devices, here is my review of ways and means to make sure you will be back home in time for dinner.

Review: The Halcyon Vector Pro fins are excellent.

by Tim Blömeke

Photo: Halcyon Dive Systems

I had to read this out loud: “A revolutionary advancement in underwater propulsion meticulously engineered for exceptional performance and versatility.” Well, well, well. What might this marketing blurb be about? A fully autonomous, fusion-powered nuclear submarine captained by a sentient AI maybe?

No? Hold on, we’re talking about scuba fins! Really? By Halcyon? Tell me more!.

I will do exactly that, in a minute. But first, a DISCLAIMER: This is not a paid review. I have no business affiliation with Halcyon Dive Systems. All opinions expressed are my own, to the extent I am able to accurately express them.

Context

All right, so Halcyon Dive systems has released a new fin – its first. To me, this is interesting for a number of reasons.

As a brand affiliated with Global Underwater Explorers (GUE), Halcyon is laser focused on the technical diving market – a demanding community of divers who, in their majority, have used heavy rubber Scubapro Jet Fins (or their various clones and derivatives) for decades.

For these divers, Jet-type fins deliver everything they need – a stiff, wide blade for frog kicks and precision maneuvering, and negative buoyancy to help with trim in a drysuit.

Arguably, Jet Fins are so prevalent in tech and cave diving that finning technique as taught in courses has been built around them. Jets are simple, relatively cheap, virtually indestructible, and they do the job.

Jet Fins have their disadvantages though: The foot pocket design clearly predates the discovery of ergonomics, and if your feet are too small to wear sizes XL and above – true for most female divers – you’re stuck with a disproportionately small blade that makes pushing multiple cylinders through the water a lot of work.

For use in a wetsuit, many divers find them too negative to easily maintain good trim, thus necessitating a second, lighter pair of fins for warm-water dives. In the technical diving world however, Jet Fins are ubiquitous, and have been for a long time.

Given Halcyon’s focus on this very market, it stands to reason that any fin released by Halcyon has to at least match the performance of Jet Fins in a drysuit. This is the context in which I am reviewing the Vector Pro fins.

First impression

Halcyon took to the challenge with an unusual design: a retro-futuristic looking, thin blade made of stiff monoprene, wide at the root and tapering toward the tip. The foot pocket comes in three sizes, with a steel spring strap that is adjustable in 8 steps. With these sizing options, virtually any diver should be able to find a pair that fits. 

So far, so interesting. The truly novel feature of the Vector Pro fins however is that their buoyancy can be adjusted using removable metal weight plugs, to make the fins more suitable for diving in a wetsuit. According to Halcyon at least, this should make the Vector Pros the one-stop shop for all your propulsion needs, regardless of the diver’s physical size and equipment configuration.

All this however comes with a price tag of about $400 in the US – easily twice the going market rate for a pair of good quality kickers, and not exactly what you’d call an impulse purchase. 

Testing


A few days ago, courtesy of GUE instructor Jimmy Choo from Singapore, I had a chance to take the Vector Pros for a spin on a 75-minute decompression dive. I was in a drysuit with a light undergarment using double Al80s and a single deco stage. I used the exact same weighting as I do with my Jets.

And boy, was I surprised. The Vector Pros are really, really good.

First off, the foot pocket feels great. These fins attach to the whole of your foot, not just the front half, as Jet Fins tend to do.

Even with the ballast in, the Vectors weigh less than my Jets. Combined with the weight distribution being biased toward the diver’s feet – the weight slots are near the foot pocket – this makes the Vectors feel almost like you’re not wearing fins at all. I even found it a bit confusing during the first few minutes of the dive.

My initial confusion quickly gave way to joy when I realized that despite their light weight and agility, the buoyancy of the Vectors is about the same as that of my significantly heavier (but also more voluminous) Jet Fins. Power-wise, they need not shy comparison either. These fins deliver an impressive amount of propulsion with all types of kicks.

In a nutshell:, the Vectors do everything Jet Fins do, but with less effort. In terms of the benchmark I set in the introduction, they pass the test with flying colors.

Unfortunately, I haven’t had a chance to try these fins in a wetsuit. However, I think it’s safe to assume that removing one or both of the weight plugs will have the desired effect on the fins’ buoyancy characteristics.

Conclusion

Scuba fins are relatively simple objects, and as such difficult to improve. As a working diver, I keep seeing the same handful of makes and models being used by divers from all over the world, with little change over the years.

When innovations are made, they tend to be a little gimmicky. Split fins and spring-loaded models, such as Scubapro’s Seawing range, cater to recreational divers who mostly flutter or scissor kick. More radical designs like Force Fins require divers to completely change their technique, which makes them a niche product at best.

Not so the Vector Pros. To my mind at least, Halcyon has accomplished something remarkable with these fins: They took a product that was simple and good to begin with and made it better without sacrificing any of the simplicity.

Whether or not the difference in performance is worth the hefty price tag remains of course up to the individual. I certainly wouldn’t mind having a pair of Vector Pros in my crate – better is the enemy of good, after all.

With this, I would ask you to excuse me – I have to go and find 400 dollars in the crack of someone else’s sofa.

What my students say about me

I’ve had a Testimonials page up for a while now, and people occasionally leave comments. You can find them here: timblmk.com/testimonials

Here’s a couple more from the Google Reviews page for Tech Asia.

I feel deeply grateful for all the kind words. Feedback like this makes me feel like I’m on the right track, and inspires me to work harder to be the best dive professional I can be.

For more testimonials and to leave your own review, please visit timblmk.com/testimonials.

Thank you and stay safe, Tim

Recreational vs. technical DPV training – which course is for me?

by Tim Blömeke

DPVs or underwater scooters are becoming increasingly popular, for good reason: They offer the opportunity to cover more ground, save gas by reducing exertion, and improve safety by enabling divers to push against currents. Plus, they’re a lot of fun.

However, the use of DPVs also comes with new ways to get yourself in trouble, so some training is absolutely necessary. For diving in open water, this training comes at two levels, recreational and technical. Below are the main features of each course.

Recreational

This course covers the basics of DPV diving, including

  • Dive planning taking battery life into account
  • Equipment pre-dive preparation and post-dive care
  • Water entry and exit
  • DPV use at the surface and underwater
  • Descents and ascents
  • Depth management in consideration of greater speed of movement
  • Gas monitoring and management while scootering

This course includes instruction on the above subjects on land, as well as two training dives on DPVs. It takes one to two days.

For recreational diving with relatively low-powered scooters, this is adequate. In these dives, a scooter is a non-critical piece of equipment, and (as in rec diving in general) major failures can be handled by simply aborting the dive, making a safety stop, and ascending to the surface. The focus is on having fun while maintaining safety.

Technical

In technical diving, a scooter becomes less of a toy and more of a tool. This course goes into quite a bit of extra detail to account for the additional equipment, planning requirements, tasks, and team procedures. We need to allow for the fact that in tech diving, immediate ascent to the surface is not available as an option for dealing with problems. In addition to the curriculum for the recreational course above, the following is included:

  • DPV rigging for one-handed use
  • User-level maintenance
  • Dive planning with gas, distance, and time constraints; coordination with boat crew
  • Buoyancy and trim
  • Team formation and cohesion, navigation, light signals, separation procedures
  • Managing DPV failures underwater
  • Towing a diver with a failed DPV
  • Gas sharing while scootering
  • Propeller entanglement procedures
  • “Parking” the scooter to enable other tasks like gas switches, DSMB deployment, etc.
  • Environmental considerations, low-impact use, DPV etiquette

Because of the greater scope of subjects, this course has a minimum of four hours of classroom and briefing time. Agency standards require two training dives to a maximum depth of 40 meters.

At Tech Asia however, we feel that two dives is a little on the low side to absorb the skills and build familiarity with the equipment, to the point where students are able to use scooters on technical dives safely without professional guidance. These things can be very distracting initially, and distraction is something we can’t afford. That’s why we offer this course with four dives, which are included in the price. Assuming no issues with skill development, the final two dives will be regular technical dives with DPVs at the student’s current level of training. Course duration is about three days.

So which one is for you?

If you just want to try your hand at something new and have fun with it, then the recreational course is fine. I’ve yet to meet a diver who doesn’t enjoy scootering. 

However, if you plan on using scooters for tech dives, or if you’re the kind of recreational diver who enjoys getting into the nuts and bolts of things, then you may want to consider the more comprehensive, technical course. Note that you don’t necessarily have to be a technical diver to enroll. All of the skills taught can be practiced in recreational equipment configuration.

Carbon Dioxide, part three: Countermeasures

The third part of my series on CO2 has been published by Alert Diver (EU)!

In the first part, I shared a personal close-call story and gave a brief overview of the carbon dioxide metabolism in the human body.

In the second part, we examined the mechanics of carbon dioxide generation and elimination, the complications introduced by depth and dive equipment, as well as the deeply unpleasant and potentially devastating effects of hypercapnia.

In the third and final part, I’m talking about ways and means at our disposal to prevent the kind of problems we spent the first two parts seeking to understand, avoid common mistakes, and become better and safer divers overall.

You can read it here: https://alertdiver.eu/en_US/articles/carbon-dioxide-the-dreaded-enemy-part-3/

Carbon Dioxide, part two: Complications

Excess carbon dioxide can be a source of danger at any level of diving, yet it is barely mentioned in course curricula. Here is part two of my three-part mini series for Alert Diver on the subject, in which I get into the nuts and bolts of how carbon dioxide affects us, and the special considerations we need to take into account when diving.

Decompressing with the US Navy

At last year’s RF4, Dr. David Doolette dropped a few remarks about how Bühlmann with gradient factors might not be the be-all and end-all of decompression models when it comes to very deep and long technical and cave dives. He encouraged divers to look into the US Navy’s Thalmann algorithm.

Here’s my piece for GUE’s InDepth magazine explaining what this is all about – an interesting variation on traditional Haldanean models that has been around since the 1980s, more or less ignored by the civilian dive community. Buckle up for some theory!

Review: 100 hours on the Fathom Mk III rebreather – UPDATED

by Tim Blömeke

Puerto Galera, Philippines, February 2024
In March last year, I trained on the Fathom Mk III CCR under Kelvin Davidson in Mexico. Since then, I’ve had opportunity to use it in different environments and circumstances, both for my own enjoyment and in my role as a dive professional. I recently completed my first 100 hours on the unit, and I thought this might be a good milestone to revisit my experiences.

Photo credit: Katia Chen

Background

I’m an open circuit trimix instructor and tech dive guide working mainly out of Puerto Galera, Philippines. I’ve been a rebreather diver since 2017, and the Fathom is my second unit.

Once bitten, twice shy: Having experienced a number of reliability issues with the electronics of my first rebreather, I wanted to switch to a manual unit. At the time, I only knew of two – KISS and the now-discontinued Pelagian – and I spent some time looking at my options for either.

Why the Fathom?

Then I stumbled across a rebreather I hadn’t heard of before, the Fathom. Going by the specs, it ticked all of my boxes. and the design notes by Fathom Dive Systems CEO Charlie Roberson spoke to me in a loud and clear voice: Robust and minimalistic, with fully potted (sealed) wiring, coax sensor connectors, adjustable constant mass flow injection of O2, passive Shearwater electronics, back-mounted counterlungs, and an option for on-board bailout.

As chance would have it, I already knew my instructor: Kelvin Davidson, owner of Third Dimension Diving in Tulum, Mexico, whose facilities my partner Katia and I had used twice on cave diving trips. I contacted him to inquire about the unit and a training course.

Although the price tag is considerable and instruction is currently available only on the far side of the planet, I was sold. I took a big leap of faith and broke the piggy bank. My partner and I purchased a unit each and booked a trip to Tulum for training.

Training

Though technically a crossover class, training on the Fathom ended up being more of a re-training in rebreather diving in general. Although I had accumulated about 120 hours on my prior unit, I hadn’t dived on closed circuit in over three years and had gotten quite rusty. There are also considerable differences in how the two units handle, as well as in the overall concepts and methods of using a rebreather as taught by Kelvin (who was himself involved in the Fathom’s development) compared to my prior training.

In a word, I had my hands full for a while, but it was more than worth it in the end: I was doing proper cave dives on my new CCR. I’m deeply grateful to Kelvin and the Third Dimension team for their support and the lessons learned, and I can’t recommend these guys highly enough.

Change of scenery

For the first 40-odd hours, I had dived in cenotes, caverns, and caves, to a maximum depth of no more than 30 meters. After a three-month stint in Europe with virtually no diving, my next task was to learn how to use the Fathom in a different environment – my home turf, the tropical seas of the Philippines, with their occasionally strong currents and greater depths.

I began with a series of shallower tryout dives to fine-tune the configuration and get used to blue-water ascents before gradually extending my range, adding a scooter and more bailouts. At this point, I would like to give a shoutout to my friend and JJ CCR virtuoso Karl Hurwood, whose advice and encouragement have been very valuable.

Handling and operation

Despite its being a manual unit, diving a Fathom requires surprisingly little manual intervention once you get the hang of it. At depth, the adjustable constant mass flow design for oxygen injection (fixed-IP first first stage and needle valve) works remarkably well. I rarely have to touch the oxygen MAV at all, except during ascent and deco, when everybody has to do that anyway, including eCCR divers.

Since I opted for the version without an ADV (another once-bitten-twice-shy situation here), I’m a little busier during descent than my JJ-using buddies. However, managing descents has become natural pretty fast. It’s much like driving a stick shift vs. automatic transmission – yes, it takes a little bit of extra practice, but ultimately, the outcome is very similar.

While I wear a drysuit for bigger (by my standards) dives, the unit is lightweight enough to be dived comfortably even in a thin wetsuit when paired with aluminum cylinders. The buoyancy characteristics and balance of my configuration feel similar to those of an AL80 set of doubles.

The work of breathing is very low, comparable to open circuit. The on-board bailout configuration with manifolded dual diluent tanks (“GUE configuration”) eliminates the bottom bailout stage, which feels very clean and leaves the front of the body unencumbered.

These days (as of February 2024), I am making 90-minute trimix dives in the 60+ meter range on a regular basis and have started using my unit for work. I dive it every chance I get outside of work as well (i.e., when not teaching open circuit) and have been averaging about 15 hours per month lately.

Summary

I can’t describe the Fathom as anything but a workhorse, in the best sense of the word. It behaves in very predictable ways and is comfortable and intuitive to dive. The build quality is stellar, and there doesn’t appear to be much about the unit that can actually break down. Aside from the canister, head (fully sealed, no service required), and counterlungs, all other parts are generic and can be sourced on the open market. This reduces dependence on manufacturer service to a minimum – not a concern for everybody, but a pretty big deal where I dive.

I’ve had zero issues that I didn’t create for myself. Should any problems materialize, I’m confident that I can deal with them with the tools and tech skills that I have (which include regulator service but not electronics). I look forward to many more hours of hassle-free diving and would unconditionally recommend the Fathom as a rebreather for remote locations.

On a final, general note, I believe that the introduction of this unit marks the point where manual CCR technology has become fully mature. While eCCRs remain an area of active research and development, and there is some competition in the sidemount CCR market as well, I find it difficult to imagine anyone spending time and money on an attempt to improve on the Fathom, much less succeed at it. If a manual backmount CCR is what you want, then Fathom is the way to go.

My experience so far
in numbers
Time on the unit: 109 h
Deepest dive: 75 m
Longest dive: 190 min
Times I had to bail out: 0
Electronics problems: 0
Mechanical problems: 0
Lessons learned: yes
Sharks seen: lots

UPDATE (September 2025)
Revisiting this post a year and a half and well over a hundred hours down the road (250+), I stand by pretty much everything said above. The Mk3 continues to perform exceptionally well – so well in fact that I recently took the plunge and became an instructor on the unit.

In terms of problems, I had one issue with the handset, which was promptly taken care of by Shearwater. For completeness sake, I’ve also had to replace an O-ring.

As regards range, my biggest dive so far was in the context of a project to dive the USS Ommaney Bay, a WW2 escort carrier at the bottom of the Sulu Sea, at 115 meters of depth. No upgrades to the unit were required for these dives; the Fathom handles them in the out-of-the-box configuration.

TL;DR: If you’re looking for a rebreather that is up to the demands of big dives dives in remote locations and just keeps going, you couldn’t wish for anything better than the Mk3. Please feel free to reach out for questions regarding the unit or inquiries about training,